Boyle 1670

Robert Boyle, Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours, London [Henry Herringman] 1670.

pp. 46–49

13. Before I saw the Notes that afforded me the precedent Narrative, I confess I suspected this man might have thus discriminated Colours, rather by the Smell than by the Touch; for some of the Ingredients imployed by Dyers to Colour things, have Scents, that are not so Languid, nor so near of Kin, but that I thought it not impossible that a very Critical Nose might distinguish them, and this I the rather suspected, because he requir’d, that the Ribbons, whose Colours he was to Name, should be offer’d him Fasting in the morning; for I have observed in Setting Dogs, that the feeding of them (especially with some sorts of Aliments)does very much impair the exquisite scent of their Noses. And though some of the foregoing particulars would have prevented that Conjecture, yet. I confess to you (Pyrophilus) that I would gladly have had the Opportunity of Examining this Man my self, and of Questioning him about divers particulars which I do not find to have been yet thought upon. And though it be not incredible to me, that since the Liquors that Dyers employ to tinge, are qualified to do so by multitudes of little Corpuscles of the Pigment or Dying stuff, which are dissolved and extracted by the Liquor, and swim to and fro in it, those Corpuscles of Colour (as the Atomists call them) insinuating themselves into, and filling all the Pores of the Body to be Dyed, may Asperate its Superficies more or less according to the Bigness and Texture of the Corpuscles of the Pigment; yet I can scarce believe, that our Blind man could distinguish all the Colours he did, meerly by the Ribbons having more or less of Asperity, so that I cannot but think, notwithstanding this History, that the Blind man distinguish’d Colours not only by the Degrees of Asperity in the Bodies offer’d to him, but by Forms of it, though this (latter) would perhaps have been very difficult for him to make an Intelligible mention of, because those Minute disparities having not been taken notice of by men for want of touch as exquisite as our Blind Mans, are things he could not have Intelligibly expressed, which will easily seem probable, if you consider, that under the name of Sharp, and Sweet, and Sour, there are abundance of, as it were, immediate peculiar Relishes or Tasts in differing sorts of Wine, which though Critical and Experience’d Palats can easily discern themselves, cannot make them be understood by others, such Minute differences not having hitherto any Distinct names assign’d them. And it seems that there was something in the Forms of Asperity that was requisite to the Distinction of Colours, besides the Degree of it, since he found it so difficult to distinguish Black and White from one another though not from other Colours. For I might urge, that he seems not consonant to himself about the Red, which as you have seen in one place, he represents as somewhat more Asperous than the Blew; and in another, very Smooth: But because he speaks of this Smoothness in that place, where he mentions the Roughness of Black, we may favourably presume that He might mean but a comparative Smoothness; and therefore I shall not Insist on this, but rather countenance my Conjecture by this, that he found it so Difficult, not only, to Discriminate Red and Blew, (though the first of our promiscuous Experiments will inform you, that the Red reflects by great Odds more Light than the other) but also to distinguish Black and White from one another, though not from other Colours. And indeed, though in the Ribbons that were offer’d him, they might be almost equally Rough, yet in such slender Corpuscles as those of Colour, there may easily enough be conceived, not only a greater Closeness of Parts, or else paucity of Protuberant Corpuscles, and the little extant Particles may be otherwise Figur’d, and Rang’d in the White than in the Black, but the Cavities may be much Deeper in the one than the other.